SINGAPORE — Presiding Judge of the State Courts See Kee Oon
released his full written judgment grounds for the City Harvest Church
trial today (Oct 22), in which he criticised the culture of insecurity
that the six convicted former leaders of the mega-church operated under.
CHC
founder Kong Hee, his deputy Tan Ye Peng, former church accountant
Serina Wee, former church investment manager Chew Eng Han, former
finance manager Sharon Tan and former church board member John Lam were
found guilty on all of counts of criminal breach of trust and/or
falsification of accounts. Here is an excerpt of what the judge said
about each of the offenders’ roles and conduct.
Kong Hee, church founder and senior pastor
“In
my assessment, Kong Hee’s evidence reveals his tendency to lapse
readily into embellishment or exaggeration ... He does not appear to
dispute that he demonstrates a penchant for hyperbole ... Kong Hee
maintains that he is a pastor and not an expert in legality. But one
does not need to be an expert in legality to appreciate certain
fundamental aspects of honesty, truth and integrity. He maintains that
he did not control Xtron, but the weight of the evidence contradicts
this claim flatly. He had also previously maintained emphatically that
no church funds were ever used (in his own words, ‘not a single cent’)
to support Sun Ho’s music career and boost her sales prior to the Roland
Poon incident, but this is again flatly contradicted by the evidence
that emerged at the trial.”
Tan Ye Peng, deputy senior pastor
“A
familiar pattern of Ye Peng’s that emerged during cross-examination was
to concede that he ‘did not know how to answer’ the question or that he
‘wasn’t thinking so much about this’ ... They reflected the reality
that he was not aware of the full range of details, but also showed the
extent of his deference to Kong Hee and Eng Han and his unquestioning
trust of his fellow CHC members within the inner circle ... He may have
believed he was acting in CHC’s best interests as Kong Hee professed to
have done, but I find that he had acted consciously and dishonestly in
applying the Building Fund for a wrong use.”
John Lam Leng Hung, former church board member
“I
accept that John Lam’s participation and involvement was much less
extensive compared with that of the other accused. However, a lesser
degree of participation does not immediately absolve him of culpability
... I am persuaded by the evidence and the prosecution’s submission that
John Lam performed a special role that none of the conspirators could
have fulfilled. He was the “inside man” from within CHC’s trusted inner
circle, occupying key positions of financial responsibility as
treasurer, finance committee member, investment committee chairman and
audit committee member. Working from those positions, I agree that John
Lam actively participated in the scheme to ensure that funding for Sun
Ho’s music career would be obtained through the Xtron and Firna bonds.”
Chew Eng Han, former church investment manager and board member
“In
my view, Eng Han’s forceful personality coupled with his determination
and drive to achieve his objectives was recognised and exploited by Kong
Hee. In this regard, they were kindred spirits and they tapped and
fuelled each other’s drive, one as a spiritual leader and the other as a
finance expert. The difficulty came when moral and ethical lines became
ambiguous and subjective, in the name of having to be discreet to avoid
disclosure of CHC’s funding for the Crossover. In Eng Han’s words: “I
think most of us didn’t know where that line exactly was.”
Notwithstanding that, Eng Han chose to cross the line with Kong Hee and
Ye Peng leading the way.”
Serina Wee, former church accountant
“Serina
cannot claim to be ignorant or unaware of the Crossover’s financing
needs that culminated in the bond transactions. She was a key member of
the ‘Crossover team’, being the one tasked with monitoring Xtron’s
finances and alerting Kong Hee and Ye Peng about upcoming requirements,
cashflow deficits, shortfalls or “valley points”. She was heavily and
inextricably embroiled in the cashflow planning and projection process
and was no unwitting accomplice. Her attempts to portray her motives as
laudable do not detract from her guilty knowledge. I do not doubt her
commitment to CHC’s vision for the Crossover and her love for CHC, but
this did not ipso facto mean that she was thus incapable of criminal
conduct.”
Sharon Tan Shao Yuen, former church finance manager
“Sharon
says that she believed that Kong Hee “loves the church a lot and will
never do anything to harm the church” ... Her defence is that she was an
ignorant and unwitting accomplice, drawn into the tangled web ... Like
the other accused persons who professed their love for CHC and support
for the Crossover vision, I do not doubt Sharon’s evidence in this
regard. I am of the view, however, that Sharon’s knowledge and
involvement went far beyond that of a mere employee who was dutifully
carrying out instructions. She supported Kong Hee’s vision and had
chosen to help facilitate the round-tripping transactions, and it can
hardly be said that she honestly believed that they were legally
entitled to do so.”
No comments:
Post a Comment